Exploring Measurement In the Food Industry. (Accidently posted it in pages, original date 8/23/17)

What question were you trying to answer and why?
The question we and our team were trying to answer was 'Do you get what you pay for?' and reason for this was to see if chip companies actually give you the most accurate amount of grams in chips, which to test us on our accuracy and precision in the lab of measurements.
What did you do during your investigation and why did you conduct your investigation in this way?
During our investigation, we decided to collect mass info about the various bags of chips, which were '28.3 g' . Once having our data measurements of all the chips we have we need to find the accuracy of the chips, this will be our middle number, and will use this to find our net weight which would be to +- 0.10 g . Our precision will be used as using a variance less than or equal to 0.20 g .
What is your claim, evidence, and reasoning?
Our claim was yes, we get what we were getting what we were pay for. Our reasoning was,
Accuracy - the net weight +- 0.10 g
Precision- having a variance  <= 0.20 g
The evidence was, The bag of hot cheatos was accurate, the info we recvived for bag one, for the gross weight was 29.98 g ,tare weight 1.51 g and then subtracting the two to get the final hot cheetos 28.47 g. The second bag, for gross weight was 30.52 g and tare weight 1.51 g getting our final number from subtracting was 29.01 g . The third bag for gross weight 30.11 g and tare weight 1.50 then subtract to get 28.61 g. Our last bag for gross weight was 30.88 g and 1.50 g for the tare weight, then subtracting 30.88 g to 1.50 g to get our final number 29.38 g.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3 Ques. Blog 11/24

1)The tasks I have completed were finding if reactivity of an element shows a periodic property. 2)I have learned how to find a certain element from its groups, column, and families. 3)I plan on noting it better so I can find the valance and groups and such much faster. In a way I can remember better.
Read more

Explore Lab Writeup - Exploring The Chemist's Dozen, The Mole

Image
1) The question we were trying to answer was do average masses of different beans really equal a standard quantity? 2)What we did for our investigation was we got 50 beans of each type of bean and than we scaled them, finding out which one weigh less in which we use that one to get our relative mass for the beans. We did it like this way so we can see if they could equal the standard quantity of the beans. 3)Our claim was yes, because the bean count was equal to it's relative mass. Our evidence is the picture below, which shows the bean type, mass, relative mass, and bean count. Our reasoning comes in 3 parts,  for the first part was why we choose yes, because the bean count all fell around the '20' amount. Rather then random numbers. On the second part for what the relative mass means, is was the relative mass will be the bean w/the smallest mass which, will be the bean all are compared to(each type of bean) example: lint bean/ kidney bean. And the last part for how this
Read more

Explore Lab Writeup - Exploring Reactivity & Peroidicity

1)The question we were trying to answer if  reactivity is a periodic property . 2)What we did for our investigation is we got certain elements and put them in regular water to see the reaction. Since water is very simple, it made sense to put the elements in it to watch the results. 3)My claim was 'Yes, reactivity is a periodic property.' My evidence was what the element was, and what we matched what happend when it touched the water. (Highest Reactivity to Low) ----Potassium | It generated a pink flame and fizzed and moved around. ----Sodium | Fizzed and spinned around. ----Calcium | Bubbled and fizzed. ----Magnesium | Nothing when in water and turned pink when heated. ----Copper | Nothing even when heated My reasoning was 'Potassium was more reactive than Sodium, because Potassium caught on fire and Sodium did not. Then Calcium didn't moved around but fizzed like Sodium. Then Magnesium had nothing to do with the water by itself intill put in heat, and Copper
Read more